|  28/06/07
          
           The response to the deadly H5N1 virus in poultry has significantly
            improved over the past three years, but the virus remains entrenched
            in several countries and will continue to spread, FAO’s Chief
            Veterinary Officer Joseph Domenech said yesterday.
           
           
          Reports of human cases occur only very sporadically, apart from
            Egypt and Indonesia, following the progressive control of H5N1 in
            poultry. “This achievement is the most important demonstration
            of the effects of worldwide efforts to contain the H5N1 virus,” Domenech
            said.  
          “In the 15 or so countries in Asia, Eastern Europe and the
            Middle East, where the H5N1 virus was introduced during the past
            six months, it was rapidly detected and eliminated or controlled.
            Most affected countries have been very open about new outbreaks.
            This shows that countries are taking the H5N1 threat seriously. They
            are better prepared today and have improved their response systems,” Domenech
            said at a press conference in Rome on the occasion of the Technical
            Meeting on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza and Human H5N1 Infection.  
            
          No reason for complacency 
          But Domenech also stressed that there should be absolutely no reason
            for complacency.  
          “Recent H5N1 outbreaks in Bangladesh, Ghana, Togo, the Czech
            Republic and Germany are a clear reminder that the virus still succeeds
            in spreading to new or previously already infected countries,” Domenech
            said.  
          A potential human influenza pandemic can not be ruled out as long
            as the virus continues to exist in poultry.  
          There are still some serious concerns with the global disease situation
            particularly with regard to Egypt, Indonesia or Nigeria.  
          “Even if bird flu has disappeared from our TV screens, it
            doesn’t mean that the risk is over. Avian influenza is not
            a one time event -- the international community will have to live
            with the disease for several years to come,” he added.  
          A long-term presence of the virus will require a long-term financial
            and political commitment from governments and the international community
            to finally contain and eradicate the virus. 
          “What makes the battle against avian influenza so difficult
            are the many high risk poultry production and marketing practices
            that still continue in many countries,” Domenech said.  
          Indonesia, for example, has more than 13 000 live poultry markets
            where birds from different origins are mixed. Unless those practices
            are modified or changed, the risk of recurrent infection remains
            high.  
          “The socially and economically equitable adjustment of poultry
            production and marketing systems for safer product supply is essential
            to reduce infection risks. Without forgetting that efficient veterinary
            services and improved private public partnership for better surveillance
            and control activities remain indispensable,“ Domenech said.  
          He called for intensified monitoring of virus circulation particularly
            in countries that are using poultry vaccines.  
          “The H5N1 virus is not stable and keeps constantly changing.
            On one occasion in China last year a new virus strain appeared with
            different immunologic characteristics which made it necessary to
            modify the vaccines used in the region concerned. This emergence
            of a new strain may have happened again more recently in Indonesia,” he
            said. 
            Call for Dialogue on Animal Health Cost-Sharing 
  Poultry vaccination and other disease control measures to combat H5N1 
  Migratory birds are not to blame for bird flu
  |