07/06/07
           
            The Tenant Farmers Association has rejected plans contained in
              a DEFRA consultation document for greater sharing of the responsibility
              and costs of animal health and welfare policy between Government
            and farmers. 
            
              
                
				TFA National Chairman  
				Reg Haydon 
				 
                
                
                    | 
               
             Speaking at the Cornwall Show TFA National Chairman Reg
              Haydon said “The consultation document starts with completely
              the wrong assumption that costs are not already shared between
              the Government and the industry. The costs of complying with regulations,
              regular testing, under-compensation for animals taken for disease
              control purposes and consequential loss are all borne by the industry
              but do not appear to be recognised by DEFRA. Any policy must start
              from the reality that there is already significant cost sharing
              between Government and industry and that applying further costs
              on the industry is not justified”. 
               
              The stated, dual aims of the new policy are to reduce disease risk
              and regulatory burden. However, it is clear that the real reason
              for the proposals is to reduce the cost of disease control faced
              by the exchequer. 
               
              “The Government’s wish to package a cost-saving exercise
              in terms of benefits to animal health and welfare is inappropriate.
              The TFA rejects the Government’s fundamental premise that
              the industry should pay more for disease control costs” said
              Mr Haydon. 
               
              “The farming industry is also becoming weary of the clichéd
              use by the Government of the term ‘partnership’ when
              it comes to animal health issues. There has been very little evidence
              of partnership to date. With bovine TB, the biggest animal health
              issue facing the South West and the wider country at the moment,
              the introduction of pre-movement testing, the use of tabular valuations
              and the non-implementation of a cull of TB affected badgers are
              all evidence that the Government’s rhetoric on partnership
              is not transferred into action. The Government is naive if it thinks
              that TB will not cast a large shadow over its future policy on
              animal health” said Mr Haydon. 
               
              “There is also the sense that the Government wants to distance
              itself from making difficult decisions on disease control by passing
              them to another body. No–one wants to see a cull of badgers
              but if that is what is needed to control the spread of TB then
              that is what must be done. The TFA’s position is clear -
              take the necessary action on TB and then we can talk about future
              policy” said Mr Haydon. 
            
                 Defra Money for Farm Health Planning 
  Badger
Trust Warns Vet's Evidence Based on Anecdote 
   NFUS-Led
 Group Tests New BVD Strategy 
              
         |