15/07/06 
            Easier and faster harvesting has become a key priority for oilseed
              rape growers across the country, according to the first-ever national
              study of oilseed rape harvesting practice. 
 
            
            Conducted by Masstock, as part of its leading Best of British
              Oilseeds initiative to improve crop output and profitability, the
              study involved a representative sample of over 280 growers across
              more than 40 counties in England and Scotland.  In total,
              they harvested nearly  
40 different OSR varieties in 500 separate crops spread over 50,000 acres (20,000
ha) in 2005 using combines of seven different makes and a vast range of sizes
and specifications. 
            Fully 75% of the crops were totally or mostly direct combined
              last season – increasing to nearly 85% with low biomass types – with
              a clear move away from swathing recorded over the past five years,
              and two thirds of growers desiccating the bulk of their crops with
              Roundup. 
            “The overwhelming majority of growers (97%) consider oilseed
              rape harvesting ease and speed important to their businesses, with
              69% rating it very important,” reported study  
              co-ordinator, David Langton. “This isn’t surprising
              given their growing reliance on the crop  
              and need to clear increasing acreages of it as efficiently as possible
              ahead of wheat harvesting and drilling. 
            “Just under 70% identify lower harvesting costs – including
              both fuel and labour savings – as a key benefit of direct
              combining, with quicker combining and reduced contractor use valued
              by more than a third of growers and more reliable harvesting, lower
              harvesting losses and more timely harvesting also mentioned by
              many. 
                 
  “The value of reliable desiccation is underlined by much greater proportions
  of those using Roundup reporting benefits in all these respects,” he
  adds. 
   
              Reflecting the generally good harvesting conditions of last summer,
              only 11% of OSR crops caused growers in the Masstock study any
              real harvesting difficulties in 2005, with 44% judged very easy
              to harvest with no problems. 
              Even so, there was a clear difference in harvestability between
              different crop types. Over 60% of the low biomass varieties Castille,
              Caracas and Canberra were rated very easy to harvest, with just
              6% causing any difficulty.  In contrast only 28% of high biomass
              types like Winner, Toccata and Royal were found to present no problems
              with 19% giving some difficulties. 
   
  “This difference was also reflected in combining speed,” notes
  David Langton. “Of the crops all or mostly direct cut, 44% of low biomass
  varieties were combined at more than 4 acres/hour, compared to just 35% of
  high biomass ones 
   
  “Interestingly too, a noticeably higher proportion of those desiccating
  all or most of their OSR with Roundup combined at higher speeds than those
  not using the desiccant. As did more of those using Claas combines as against
  other makes.” 
   
              The majority of Masstock growers pinpointed lodged and tall crops
              as the two principal reasons for any harvesting difficulties, with
              uneven ripening and uneven crops also cited as important factors
              by more than 30%. 
   
              They identified the three low biomass varieties, Castille, Caracas
              and Canberra as by far the easiest to combine varieties over the
              years and high biomass Winner clearly the least easy, with other
              varieties in between. And they went on to establish lodging resistance
              and short stems as the two most important considerations in variety
              selection for ease and speed of harvesting. 
            “Our study confirms harvestability is something more and
              more growers are looking for in their oilseed rape these days,” stresses
              David Langton. “It’s becoming more important because
              they have larger acreages to deal with, fewer men and machines
              available and less capacity to tolerate risk. And, of course, controlling
              costs is at least as vital as maximising output. 
                 
  “Our work also shows that, as with other critical areas of oilseed rape
  improvement, faster and easier harvesting demands attention to a number of
  different aspects of crop management at the same time. Low biomass varieties
  are an obvious advantage in this respect, as is Roundup desiccation. But the
  type of combine also appears to be a significant consideration. As, indeed,
  is the whole complex business of achieving the correct plant population and
  canopy structure in the first place.” 
            
			    Crop
			  Market Update from Gleadell 
			    Claas Gear-Up For Challenging OSR Harvest 
			    Arable Units Face Acute Autumn Weed Control Dilemma 
   Winter oilseed rape crops on track for average harvest 
            
             |